But that alone would not be enough – a “clever mix of measures” is necessary as early as possible, shows an analysis of more than 4,500 government measures against the spread of the coronavirus by researchers at the Complexity Science Hub Vienna (CSH).

But that alone would not be enough – a “clever mix of measures” is necessary as early as possible, shows an analysis of more than 4,500 government measures against the spread of the coronavirus by researchers at the Complexity Science Hub Vienna (CSH).

-Pandemic. But that alone would not be enough – a “clever mix of measures” is necessary as early as possible, shows an analysis of more than 4,500 government measures against the spread of the coronavirus by researchers at the Complexity Science Hub Vienna (CSH).

The scientists at the CSH collected the state measures that were taken worldwide between January and May 2020 to contain the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Its database “COVID-19 Control Strategies List” (CCCSL), which is also used by the WHO, comprises more than 4,500 individual measures in 76 different regions worldwide.

Also interesting:

Infectiologist: “The virus will be with us for years to come”

Now, together with international colleagues, they have quantified the contribution of each measure to reducing the number of reproductions “R (t)” and have published the results as a preprint – without being assessed by experts. The number of reproductions indicates how many people are infected on average by a sick person. To contain the spread of a disease, R (t) must be less than one.

“There is no one-size-fits-all solution”

The analysis shows that “there is no one-size-fits-all solution and no single measure alone can reduce R (t) below one. What is needed is a combination of measures to curb the spread of the virus,” the researchers write in their paper.

Also interesting:

Corona – which test can do what?

Social distancing and school closings work best

If you look at the individual measures alone, “social distancing clearly works best,” said study director Peter Klimek from the CSH and the Medical University of Vienna in a CSH broadcast. Specifically, the scientists have identified the closure of educational institutions as by far the most effective measure. The first author of the study, Nils Haug, also sees the reason for the high effectiveness, also from the CSH and the Med-Uni Vienna, among others. also in the fact that not only children and young people have to stay at home, but also many parents, as he explained to the APA.

Interesting:

Why wearing masks is still recommended

Home office and get-togethers also effectively prohibit

The prohibition of small gatherings is also highly effective. The closure of shops and restaurants or the introduction of home offices can be expected. They also include better availability of protective equipment such as mouth and nose protection, border closures, active risk communication, for example by promoting security protocols in companies or at events, strengthening the health systems in dealing with the pandemic, for example through targeted education about COVID -19, providing protective equipment to healthcare workers and separating patients with and without COVID-19 in hospitals are among the most effective measures.mypaperwriter scam

“No measure alone is effective enough to reduce R (t) below one”

“However, no measure alone is effective enough to reduce R (t) below one,” emphasized Haug. He cites the closure of kindergartens, schools and universities as an example. According to the study, this is the most effective measure, but reduces the number of reproductions by a maximum of 0.34. Assuming that R (t) without measures would be around three, the closure of educational institutions would mean that each infected person would only infect an average of 2.7 instead of 3 people – but the disease would nevertheless spread quickly.

A clever mix of measures required

In order to actually contain this spread, what is needed is a “clever mix of measures – and the earlier the better,” emphasize the scientists. “Timing is actually half the battle,” says Haug. For example, the voluntary wearing of mouth and nose protection, which was advertised at an early stage, is much more effective than mandatory masking that is only prescribed at a later point in time.

“Early and voluntary interventions are more effective than those that are introduced late and mandatory”

The researchers see a pattern here: “Early and voluntary interventions are more effective than those that are introduced late and mandatory,” stressed Haug. This also applied to the (self) isolation of people with symptoms or to safety measures in the workplace. This is why the scientists see active risk communication with the public and the education and information of all relevant interest groups as the key to containing the epidemic.

Good news

Lockdowns were also shown to be very effective in the analysis if they were imposed early on. “The good news of our study is: It doesn’t necessarily take such extensive measures to flatten the curve. With the right combination of less severe interventions, the number of reproductions can also be reduced considerably,” emphasized Klimek.

In their study, the research team used four different methods of data analysis that “came to remarkably similar conclusions”. This makes Klimek confident “that our ranking is very meaningful and that decision-makers can be of great help in combating the second wave of the pandemic that is currently beginning.”

Read news for free for 1 month now! * * The test ends automatically.

More on this ▶

NEWS FROM THE NETWORK

Win true wireless earphones from JBL now! (E-media.at)

New access (yachtrevue.at)

8 reasons why it’s great to be single (lustaufsleben.at)

Salmon shrimp burger with wasabi mayonnaise and honey cucumber (gusto.at)

In the new trend: Shock-Down – how long can the economy withstand lockdowns? (Trend.at)

The 35 best family series to laugh and feel good (tv-media.at)

E-Scooter in Vienna: All providers and prices 2020 in comparison (autorevue.at)

Social distancing and the closure of educational institutions are the most effective measures to contain

corona

-Pandemic. But that alone would not be enough – a “clever mix of measures” is necessary as early as possible, shows an analysis of more than 4,500 government measures against the spread of the coronavirus by researchers at the Complexity Science Hub Vienna (CSH).

The scientists at the CSH collected the state measures that were taken worldwide between January and May 2020 to contain the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Its database “COVID-19 Control Strategies List” (CCCSL), which is also used by the WHO, comprises more than 4,500 individual measures in 76 different regions worldwide.

Also interesting:

Infectiologist: “The virus will be with us for years to come”

Now, together with international colleagues, they have quantified the contribution of each measure to reducing the number of reproductions “R (t)” and have published the results as a preprint – without being assessed by experts. The number of reproductions indicates how many people are infected on average by a sick person. To contain the spread of a disease, R (t) must be less than one.

“There is no one-size-fits-all solution”

The analysis shows that “there is no one-size-fits-all solution and no single measure alone can reduce R (t) below one. What is needed is a combination of measures to curb the spread of the virus,” the researchers write in their paper.

Also interesting:

Corona – which test can do what?

Social distancing and school closings work best

If you look at the individual measures alone, “social distancing clearly works best,” said study director Peter Klimek from the CSH and the Medical University of Vienna in a CSH broadcast. Specifically, the scientists have identified the closure of educational institutions as by far the most effective measure. The first author of the study, Nils Haug, also sees the reason for the high effectiveness, also from the CSH and the Med-Uni Vienna, among others. also in the fact that not only children and young people have to stay at home, but also many parents, as he explained to the APA.

Interesting:

Why wearing masks is still recommended

Home office and get-togethers also effectively prohibit

The prohibition of small gatherings is also highly effective. The closure of shops and restaurants or the introduction of home offices can be expected. They also include better availability of protective equipment such as mouth and nose protection, border closures, active risk communication, for example by promoting security protocols in companies or at events, strengthening the health systems in dealing with the pandemic, for example through targeted education about COVID -19, providing protective equipment to healthcare workers and separating patients with and without COVID-19 in hospitals are among the most effective measures.

“No measure alone is effective enough to reduce R (t) below one”

“However, no measure alone is effective enough to reduce R (t) below one,” emphasized Haug. He cites the closure of kindergartens, schools and universities as an example. According to the study, this is the most effective measure, but reduces the number of reproductions by a maximum of 0.34. Assuming that R (t) without measures would be around three, the closure of educational institutions would mean that each infected person would only infect an average of 2.7 instead of 3 people – but the disease would nevertheless spread quickly.

A clever mix of measures required

In order to actually contain this spread, what is needed is a “clever mix of measures – and the earlier the better,” emphasize the scientists. “Timing is actually half the battle,” says Haug. For example, the voluntary wearing of mouth and nose protection, which was advertised at an early stage, is much more effective than mandatory masking that is only prescribed at a later point in time.

“Early and voluntary interventions are more effective than those that are introduced late and mandatory”

The researchers see a pattern here: “Early and voluntary interventions are more effective than those that are introduced late and mandatory,” stressed Haug. This also applied to the (self) isolation of people with symptoms or to safety measures in the workplace. This is why the scientists see active risk communication with the public and the education and information of all relevant interest groups as the key to containing the epidemic.

Good news

Lockdowns were also shown to be very effective in the analysis if they were imposed early on. “The good news of our study is: It doesn’t necessarily take such extensive measures to flatten the curve. With the right combination of less severe interventions, the number of reproductions can also be reduced considerably,” emphasized Klimek.

In their study, the research team used four different methods of data analysis that “came to remarkably similar conclusions”. This makes Klimek confident “that our ranking is very meaningful and that decision-makers can be of great help in combating the second wave of the pandemic that is currently beginning.”

Read news for free for 1 month now! * * The test ends automatically.

More on this ▶

NEWS FROM THE NETWORK

Win true wireless earphones from JBL now! (E-media.at)

New access (yachtrevue.at)

8 reasons why it’s great to be single (lustaufsleben.at)

Salmon shrimp burger with wasabi mayonnaise and honey cucumber (gusto.at)

In the new trend: Shock-Down – how long can the economy withstand lockdowns? (Trend.at)

The 35 best family series to laugh and feel good (tv-media.at)

E-Scooter in Vienna: All providers and prices 2020 in comparison (autorevue.at)

Social distancing and the closure of educational institutions are the most effective measures to contain

corona

-Pandemic. But that alone would not be enough – a “clever mix of measures” is necessary as early as possible, shows an analysis of more than 4,500 government measures against the spread of the coronavirus by researchers at the Complexity Science Hub Vienna (CSH).

The scientists at the CSH collected the state measures that were taken worldwide between January and May 2020 to contain the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Its database “COVID-19 Control Strategies List” (CCCSL), which is also used by the WHO, comprises more than 4,500 individual measures in 76 different regions worldwide.

Also interesting:

Infectiologist: “The virus will be with us for years to come”

Now, together with international colleagues, they have quantified the contribution of each measure to reducing the number of reproductions “R (t)” and have published the results as a preprint – without being assessed by experts. The number of reproductions indicates how many people are infected on average by a sick person. To contain the spread of a disease, R (t) must be less than one.

“There is no one-size-fits-all solution”

The analysis shows that “there is no one-size-fits-all solution and no single measure alone can reduce R (t) below one. What is needed is a combination of measures to curb the spread of the virus,” the researchers write in their paper.

Also interesting:

Corona – which test can do what?

Social distancing and school closings work best

If you look at the individual measures alone, “social distancing clearly works best,” said study director Peter Klimek from the CSH and the Medical University of Vienna in a CSH broadcast. Specifically, the scientists have identified the closure of educational institutions as by far the most effective measure. The first author of the study, Nils Haug, also sees the reason for the high effectiveness, also from the CSH and the Med-Uni Vienna, among others. also in the fact that not only children and young people have to stay at home, but also many parents, as he explained to the APA.

Interesting:

Why wearing masks is still recommended

Home office and get-togethers also effectively prohibit

The prohibition of small gatherings is also highly effective. The closure of shops and restaurants or the introduction of home offices can be expected. They also include better availability of protective equipment such as mouth and nose protection, border closures, active risk communication, for example by promoting security protocols in companies or at events, strengthening the health systems in dealing with the pandemic, for example through targeted education about COVID -19, providing protective equipment to healthcare workers and separating patients with and without COVID-19 in hospitals are among the most effective measures.

“No measure alone is effective enough to reduce R (t) below one”

“However, no measure alone is effective enough to reduce R (t) below one,” emphasized Haug.